Bible Study for Amateurs #32 – Papias, Mark, and Slaves

When Papias speaks of Mark as Peter’s “interpreter,” how would a reader in the second century CE understand that?

Enter your comment here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Email (Address never made public)

Name

Website

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Lex Lata on The Importance of Reading Well: Michael Paulkovich, Bart Ehrman, and the Existence of Jesus24 Mar 2023
Ha! So, to sum up: Paulkovich subjects some of Ehrman's work to motivated eisegesis, attributes a specific position to Ehrman…
The Amateur Exegete on J.R. Daniel Kirk: The God of Abraham22 Mar 2023
I agree. I'm skeptical there was an Abraham but even if there was it seems more likely he'd be acquainted…
Lex Lata on J.R. Daniel Kirk: The God of Abraham22 Mar 2023
Taking this a step further into more historical than literary territory, did anyone in the time period associated with Abraham…
Biblical Inerrancy: Trying to Prove the Wrong Thing, Part 4 – Triggermanblog on Apologetic Plagiarism: Robert Clifton Robinson on Joshua’s Long Day22 Mar 2023
[…] that would either naturalize what occurred, if he even believed that it occurred at all. And reading his post,…
Kipp Davis on the Isaiah Scrolls of Cave 1Q – The Amateur Exegete on Kipp Davis on the Discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls (and More)21 Mar 2023
[…] the beginning of the year, I posted to this blog a link to Kipp Davis’ first video in his…