Jacob Lollar: “A Well-Known Textual Variant” in the Letter to the Ephesians

Jacob A. Lollar, “The Meaning of Ephesians: Competing Christianities in Second-Century Ephesus,” NovT 67 (2025), 342.

A well-known textual variant exists in the opening line of Ephesians: several early mss lack the inscription ἐν Ἐφέσῳ in the original scribal hand. This variant is particularly noteworthy because, without the address, there is nothing to link this letter specifically to Ephesus. [Edgar] Goodspeed recognized this in the 1930s, saying that the letter “reflects no definite, localized, historical situation which it is intended to meet,” but is rather an amassing of Pauline thought and theology: “it is altogether built up of Pauline materials […] it reads like a commentary on the Pauline epistles.” The missing title is key to the letter and its function: first, it shows there is nothing to explicitly link the letter to Ephesus; second, it reveals important information regarding the date and reception of the letter as “to the Ephesians.”

1 thought on “Jacob Lollar: “A Well-Known Textual Variant” in the Letter to the Ephesians

  1. jiuberto monteiro's avatar
    jiuberto monteiro 15 Mar 2026 — 4:51 pm

    Ben, I’m trying to understand how you think James relates to the theology of Job. If James denies that God tempts anyone (James 1:13), and if the prologue of Job seems to present God as initiating the testing of Job through the satan, how do you think James would interpret the book of Job? Do you think James is intentionally correcting the theological implication of Job, or would he be rereading Job in a way that separates God from the temptation (for example by emphasizing secondary agents like Satan)?

    Like

Leave a comment

search previous next tag category expand menu location phone mail time cart zoom edit close